Blog

Targeting nanoplastic and microplastic removal in treated wastewater with a simple indicator | Nature Water

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Nature Water (2024 )Cite this article Sludge Dewatering Cationic Polymer

Targeting nanoplastic and microplastic removal in treated wastewater with a simple indicator | Nature Water

With growing concerns over plastic accumulation in the environment, it is imperative to quantify nanoplastic and microplastic release to water bodies via water treatment plant effluent streams. Current methodological limitations present a major challenge for continuous monitoring of nanosized pollutants in effluent streams. In this work, a novel correlation was established between removal of nanoplastics and total suspended solids (TSS) during aggregation-based wastewater treatment. The established correlation successfully predicted nanoplastic removal for a wide range of relevant nanoplastic properties, including polymer type, size, surface functionalization and ageing history, under 41 different physico-chemical and activated sludge treatment conditions (R2 = 0.92; n = 117). The results of our correlation reveal a predicted nanoplastic removal between 39% and 69% for typical water treatment effluent streams governed by current TSS regulations in North America. The study also reveals the potential of using TSS as a simple metric to estimate microfibre, microsphere and microfragment removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

The data supporting the findings in this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. Data collected and used to create the figures in this study are available via figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22082369.

The relevant code used for optimizing the collision efficiency ratio parameter and plotting the predicted nanoplastic removal can be accessed at repositories under the GitHub account in ref. 52.

Bouwmeester, H., Hollman, P. C. H. & Peters, R. J. B. Potential health impact of environmentally released micro-and nanoplastics in the human food production chain: experiences from nanotoxicology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 8932–8947 (2015).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Strungaru, S.-A., Jijie, R., Nicoara, M., Plavan, G. & Faggio, C. Micro-(nano) plastics in freshwater ecosystems: abundance, toxicological impact and quantification methodology. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 110, 116–128 (2019).

Sun, J., Dai, X., Wang, Q., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. & Ni, B.-J. Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: detection, occurrence and removal. Water Res. 152, 21–37 (2019).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lv, X. et al. Microplastics in a municipal wastewater treatment plant: fate, dynamic distribution, removal efficiencies, and control strategies. J. Cleaner Prod. 225, 579–586 (2019).

Ngo, P. L., Pramanik, B. K., Shah, K. & Roychand, R. Pathway, classification and removal efficiency of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants. Environ. Pollut. 255, 113326 (2019).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gong, Y., Bai, Y., Zhao, D. & Wang, Q. Aggregation of carboxyl-modified polystyrene nanoplastics in water with aluminum chloride: structural characterization and theoretical calculation. Water Res. 208, 117884 (2021).

Zhang, Y. et al. Improving nanoplastic removal by coagulation: impact mechanism of particle size and water chemical conditions. J. Hazard. Mater. 425, 12792 (2021).

Liu, X., Yuan, W., Di, M., Li, Z. & Wang, J. Transfer and fate of microplastics during the conventional activated sludge process in one wastewater treatment plant of China. Chem. Eng. J. 362, 176–182 (2019).

Raju, S. et al. Improved methodology to determine the fate and transport of microplastics in a secondary wastewater treatment plant. Water Res. 173, 115549 (2020).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cai, H. et al. Analysis of environmental nanoplastics: progress and challenges. Chem. Eng. J. 410, 128208 (2021).

Nguyen, B. et al. Separation and analysis of microplastics and nanoplastics in complex environmental samples. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 858–866 (2019).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silva, A. B. et al. Microplastics in the environment: challenges in analytical chemistry—a review. Anal. Chim. Acta 1017, 1–19 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bilotta, G. S. & Brazier, R. E. Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. Water Res. 42, 2849–2861 (2008).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Duan, J. & Gregory, J. Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 100, 475–502 (2003).

Crittenden, J. C., Trussell, R. R., Hand, D. W., Howe, K. J. & Tchobanoglous, G. MWH’s Water Treatment: Principles and Design (John Wiley & Sons, 2012).

Pernitsky, D. J. & Edzwald, J. K. Solubility of polyaluminium coagulants. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 52, 395–406 (2003).

Lapointe, M., Papineau, I., Peldszus, S., Peleato, N. & Barbeau, B. Identifying the best coagulant for simultaneous water treatment objectives: interactions of mononuclear and polynuclear aluminum species with different natural organic matter fractions. J. Water Process Eng. 40, 101829 (2021).

O’Melia, C. R. In The Scientific Basis of Flocculation (ed. Kenneth J. Ives) 219–268 (Springer, 1978).

Schür, C. et al. Incubation in wastewater reduces the multigenerational effects of microplastics in Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 2491–2499 (2021).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fadare, O. O. et al. Humic acid alleviates the toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastic particles to Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Nano 6, 1466–1477 (2019).

Wheeler, K. E. et al. Environmental dimensions of the protein corona. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 617–629 (2021).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elimelech, M., Gregory, J. & Jia, X. Particle Deposition and Aggregation: Measurement, Modelling and Simulation (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013).

Adler, P. M. Heterocoagulation in shear flow. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 83, 106–115 (1981).

Kusters, K. A. The influence of turbulence on aggregation of small particles in agitated vessels. PhD thesis, Eindhoven Univ. Technology (1991).

Balakin, B., Hoffmann, A. C. & Kosinski, P. The collision efficiency in a shear flow. Chem. Eng. Sci. 68, 305–312 (2012).

Nasser, M. S. & James, A. E. The effect of polyacrylamide charge density and molecular weight on the flocculation and sedimentation behaviour of kaolinite suspensions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 52, 241–252 (2006).

Lapointe, M. & Barbeau, B. Understanding the roles and characterizing the intrinsic properties of synthetic vs. natural polymers to improve clarification through interparticle bridging: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 231, 115893 (2020).

Patience, M., Addai-Menash, J. & Ralston, J. Investigation of the effect of polymer type on flocculation, rheology and dewatering behaviour of kaolinite dispersions. Int. J. Miner. Process. 71, 247–268 (2003).

Lapointe, M., Jahandideh, H., Farner, J. M. & Tufenkji, N. Super-bridging fibrous materials for water treatment. npj Clean Water 5, 11 (2022).

Logan, B. E. In Environmental Transport Processes 362–407 (John Wiley & Sons, 2012).

Kawamura, S. Integrated Design and Operation of Water Treatment Facilities (John Wiley & Sons, 2000).

Jarvis, P., Jefferson, B. & Parsons, S. A. Floc structural characteristics using conventional coagulation for a high doc, low alkalinity surface water source. Water Res. 40, 2727–2737 (2006).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ministry of the Environment and the Fight against Climate Change Regulations on municipal wastewater treatment works chapter Q-2.R. 34.1 (MELCC, 2013).

Health Canada Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality: Guideline Technical Document—Turbidity (Water and Air Quality Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, 2013).

Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment: Application for Water Safety Management. Report No. 9241565373 (World Health Organization, 2016).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Distribution System Indicators of Drinking Water Quality (Office of Water, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, 2006).

Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L., Stensel, H. D., & Metcalf & Eddy Inc. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse (McGraw-Hill Education, 2003).

Lapointe, M., Farner, J. M., Hernandez, L. M. & Tufenkji, N. Understanding and improving microplastic removal during water treatment: impact of coagulation and flocculation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 8719–8727 (2020).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shahi, N. K., Maeng, M., Kim, D. & Dockko, S. Removal behavior of microplastics using alum coagulant and its enhancement using polyamine-coated sand. Process Safety Environ. Protect. 141, 9–17 (2020).

Thomas, D. N., Judd, S. J. & Fawcett, N. Flocculation modelling: a review. Water Res. 33, 1579–1592 (1999).

Xue, J., Peldszus, S., Van Dyke, M. I. & Huck, P. M. Removal of polystyrene microplastic spheres by alum-based coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation (CFS) treatment of surface waters. Chem. Eng. J. 422, 130023 (2021).

Rajala, K., Grönfors, O., Hesampour, M. & Mikola, A. Removal of microplastics from secondary wastewater treatment plant effluent by coagulation/flocculation with iron, aluminum and polyamine-based chemicals. Water Res. 183, 116045 (2020).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ter Halle, A. & Ghiglione, J. F. Nanoplastics: a complex, polluting terra incognita. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 14466–14469 (2021).

Gigault, J. et al. Nanoplastics are neither microplastics nor engineered nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 501–507 (2021).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development Test No. 303: Simulation Test-Aerobic Sewage Treatment–A: Activated Sludge Units; B: Biofilms (OECD Publishing, 2001).

Lapointe, M. & Barbeau, B. Evaluation of activated starch as an alternative to polyacrylamide polymers for drinking water flocculation. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 64, 333–343 (2014).

Lapointe, M. & Barbeau, B. Dual starch–polyacrylamide polymer system for improved flocculation. Water Res. 124, 202–209 (2017).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kurusu, R. S., Lapointe, M. & Tufenkji, N. Sustainable iron-grafted cellulose fibers enable coagulant recycling and improve contaminant removal in water treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 430, 132927 (2022).

Rice, E. W., Baird, R. B., Eaton, A. D. & Clesceri, L. S. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (American Public Health Association, 2012).

MATLAB and Optimization Toolbox R2022b (The MathWorks Inc., 2022).

MATLAB and Curve Fitting Toolbox R2022b (The MathWorks Inc., 2022).

Abi Farraj, S. et al. Targeting nanoplastic and microplastic removal in treated wastewater. GitHub https://github.com/Sinanaf (2023).

We acknowledge the Canada Research Chairs Program (CRC-2016-00205, N.T.), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (RGPIN/04519-2019, N.T.), the Killam Research Fellowship (7025-19-0049, N.T.) and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (36368, 40070, N.T.). S.A.F. was supported by a Graduate Excellence Fellowship at McGill University, M.L. was supported by a NSERC Postdoctoral Fellowship, R.S.K. was supported by NSERC and Fonds de Recherche du Québec Nature et technologies (FRQNT) Postdoctoral Fellowships and Z.L. was supported by NSERC Collaborative Research and Training Experience (CREATE) program. We thank L. Hernandez (McGill University) for assistance with electron microscopy imaging and Q. Zheng for assistance with synthetic wastewater jar test experiments.

The following authors contributed equally: Sinan Abi Farraj, Matthew Lapointe.

Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Sinan Abi Farraj, Mathieu Lapointe, Rafael S. Kurusu & Nathalie Tufenkji

Department of Construction Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, University of Quebec, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Department of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Zhen Liu & Benoit Barbeau

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

S.A.F, M.L. and N.T. conceived and designed the project and prepared the manuscript. S.A.F., M.L. and R.S.K. performed the experiments with synthetic wastewater. S.A.F., Z.L. and B.B. sourced the municipal wastewater influents, activated sludge-treated samples and aerated lagoon water samples and performed the relevant experiments. M.L. designed and constructed the reactor for pilot-scale experiments. M.L. initiated the concept of the correlation between nanoplastics and TSS removal. S.A.F. derived the mathematical model and designed the modelling approach and visual elements of the paper.

Correspondence to Mathieu Lapointe or Nathalie Tufenkji.

M.L. and N.T. have applied for a patent on the use of fibre-based materials for water treatment. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Nature Water thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Abi Farraj, S., Lapointe, M., Kurusu, R.S. et al. Targeting nanoplastic and microplastic removal in treated wastewater with a simple indicator. Nat Water (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00177-3

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00177-3

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Nature Water (Nat Water) ISSN 2731-6084 (online)

Targeting nanoplastic and microplastic removal in treated wastewater with a simple indicator | Nature Water

Dadmac 65% Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.