Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 17368 (2023 ) Cite this article Tpv Supplier
Creating ultrathin, mountable fibers from a wide range of polymeric functional materials has made electrospinning an adequate approach to producing highly flexible and elastic materials. In this paper, electrospinning was utilized to produce thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) nanofibrous membranes for the purpose of studying their thermal and mechanical properties. Towards a study of the effects of fiber orientation and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) as a filler on both mechanical and thermal characteristics of electrospun TPU mats, an experimental comparison was held between unidirectional and randomly aligned TPU and TPU/MWCNTs nanofibrous structures. The incorporation of MWCNTs into randomly oriented TPU nanofibers resulted in a significant increase in Young's modulus (E), from 3.9 to 7.5 MPa. On the other hand, for unidirectionally spun fibers, Young's modulus increased from 17.1 to 18.4 MPa upon the addition of MWCNTs. However, dynamic mechanical analysis revealed a different behavior. The randomly oriented specimens exhibited a storage modulus with a significant increase from 180 to 614 MPa for TPU and TPU/MWCNTs mats, respectively, and a slight increase from 119 to 143 MPa for unidirectional TPU and TPU/MWCNTs mats, respectively. Meanwhile, the loss modulus increased with the addition of MWCNTs from 15.7 to 58.9 MPa and from 6.4 to 12 MPa for the random and aligned fibers, respectively. The glass transition values for all the mats fell in the temperature range of – 60 to − 20 °C. The thermal degradation of the membranes was not significantly affected by the addition of MWCNTs, indicating that the mixing of the two constituents did not change the TPU’s polymer structure and that the TPU/MWCNTs nanocomposite exhibited stable thermal degradation properties.
Shuihong Zhu, Sen Wang, … Youhui Lin
Minkyung Lee, Hojung Kwak, … Dongyeop X. Oh
Junqi Yi, Guijin Zou, … Xiaodong Chen
The demand for lightweight yet strong structures in various applications has led to the exploration of novel designs using polymeric nanofibers1. Nanofibrous membranes with enhanced thermomechanical properties have garnered considerable interest in fields such as energy storage2, filtration3, tissue engineering4, and stretchable electromechanical devices5. Electrospinning is a widely employed manufacturing technique used to produce thin, non-woven nanofibrous films by applying high voltage between conductive electrodes, resulting in fibers with diameters typically in the hundreds of nanometers6,7. This technique has gained widespread attention due to its high efficiency, simplicity, and ability to spin inorganic materials8.
Although electrospinning is commonly used for spinning nanofibers from polymers, recent studies suggest that it is also possible to electrospin other materials, such as carbon-based materials and ceramics9. Nevertheless, polymers remain the predominant choice for electrospinning due to their unique characteristics and versatility. Polymers offer a wide range of tunable properties, including mechanical strength, flexibility, biocompatibility, and chemical stability, making them well-suited for various applications10. Polymers most commonly used in electrospinning include poly(lactic acid) (PLA)11, poly(caprolactone) (PCL)12, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)13, poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)14, and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)15. TPU is a highly versatile material widely used in various industrial sectors, such as biomedical, electronics, and automotive engineering, owing to its exceptional mechanical properties, including low compression set, high resilience, and resistance to tears, abrasions, impacts, and environmental factors16,17.
In recent years, the effect of fiber orientation on the properties of electrospun membranes, particularly their mechanical behavior, has grabbed the attention of researchers. Kijeńska-Gawrońska et al.18 investigated the combined effect of fiber diameter and orientation on the mechanical and thermal properties of TPU electrospun membranes and observed that while fiber orientation had a significant effect on the mechanical properties, the impact of fiber diameter was minimal. Furthermore, both parameters had little influence on the thermal characteristics of the mats. Pham Le et al.19 explored the mechanical properties of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) nanofibers, where different speeds of a rotating drum were used to obtain varying fiber orientation angles. The study revealed that higher rotating speeds resulted in closer orientation angles approaching 0° and the Young's modulus (E) was significantly affected by the fiber orientation, with E for membranes with fibers aligned at 0° being twice that of randomly oriented fibrous membranes. Similar findings were reported by Maciel et al.20.
Another large area of research that is gaining recognition in the electrospinning field is the incorporation of various nanomaterials in the electrospun membrane. The resulting composite nanofibers could possess improved electrical21, magnetoelectric20, photosensitive22, thermal23, and antibacterial24 properties, thus making them suitable for use in a much broader spectrum of fields25. These nanocomposites have a wide range of possible applications, including but not limited to sensing devices26, wearable electronics27, drug-delivery agents, antibacterial fields28, and anti-static coatings29. The nano-additives can be made of materials ranging from metals to metal oxides, carbon, and polymers30. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as a filler material are interesting due to their capacity to enhance the thermal behavior, mechanical properties, and electrical conductivity of polymer nanocomposites, even at very low weight percentages of the polymer31.
Eivazi et al. 32 studied the influence of varying concentrations of CNTs in randomly oriented TPU electrospun nanofibers for biomedical applications, ranging from 0.01 to 1 wt.%. The results demonstrated that the inclusion of CNTs led to notable improvements in the Young's modulus, conductivity and toughness, however, it was observed that the maximum strain of the nanofibrous mats experienced a noticeable decrease as a consequence of increasing the CNTs percentage. Similar results were reported by Özkan et al.33, who compared the mechanical properties of TPU, TPU/CNTs, and TPU/graphene randomly aligned nanofibrous membranes. The inclusion of CNTs increased the tensile strength of the materials, while graphene had a significant detrimental effect on the mechanical characteristics.
Recent studies show a promising future in stretchable electromechanical devices for TPU/CNTs nanofibrous materials. Wang et al. 34 manufactured MWCNTs/TPU nanofiber films that were flexible, had a wide temperature range, and improved combustion carbon performance. Tang et al.35 developed a highly-stretchable CNTs/TPU composite nanofiber yarn for the development of strain sensors for smart sports bandages. Huang et al.36 developed a highly stretchable, conductive, and sensitive strain-sensing material based on a CNTs-bridged AgNPs strain sensor and had promising applications in flexible and wearable devices. Han et al.37 developed multi-responsive actuators based on modified electrospun films with MWCNTs.
This study delves into the incorporation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) (denoted by CNT for more simplicity) into thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) electrospun nanofibrous membranes. The membranes were manufactured in two different fiber orientations, namely, random and unidirectional alignment. The aim of the investigation was to examine the impact of CNT addition on the thermomechanical properties of the TPU membranes. However, given the limited existing research in this area, a major goal of this paper was to gain a deeper understanding of how fiber orientation influences the mechanical and thermal behaviors of these membranes. Such insights are crucial for optimizing the performance of these membranes in a wide range of future applications, including soft actuators and strain sensors.
The polymer being electrospun is thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) S80A supplied by Elastollan Co., Ltd, Japan. N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF 94% Alpha Chemika, India) was utilized as a solvent for TPU to prepare the polymer solution. Muti-walled carbon-nanotubes (MWCNTs) with an average diameter of 10 nm and an aspect ratio greater than 100 were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Co., Ltd, USA, and used as the reinforcement phase in the composite.
To conduct a comprehensive and comparative investigation, four types of membranes were manufactured by electrospinning technique. Pure TPU and TPU/CNT solutions were prepared and electrospun into randomly oriented and unidirectionally aligned fiber membranes.
To prepare the TPU/CNT solution, TPU bullets were dispersed in DMF at a concentration of 15 wt.% and stirred for 8 h at room temperature. CNT were uniformly dispersed in the DMF at a concentration of 0.2 wt.% (1.3 wt.% of TPU) using an ultrasonic processor (HIELSCHER UP 200S, Germany) prior to the addition of the TPU bullets. The resulting solution was loaded into a 5 ml syringe and inserted into the NANON-01B electrospinning setup (MECC CO., LTD Japan). A dehumidification setup was connected to the electrospinning unit to ensure a controlled environment with minimal humidity during the manufacturing process to prevent the formation of beads. To fabricate the randomly oriented nanofibrous membranes, a flat collector was used to gather the electrospun fibers, while a rotating drum was employed to collect the unidirectional fibers for the other membranes as shown in Fig. 1.
Electrospinning schematic diagrams for (a) random and (b) aligned nanofibers.
To optimize the electrospinning process, various parameters such as applied voltage, feed rate, stand-off distance, spinneret speed, and humidity percentage are often adjusted38. After multiple iterations, the optimal parameters were determined for the electrospinning of both pure TPU and TPU/CNT solutions and utilized for membrane fabrication. A direct current voltage of 25 kV and a feed rate of 0.76 ml/h were used to fabricate randomly oriented and unidirectional pure TPU membranes, while TPU/CNT membranes were produced using a direct current voltage of 28 kV and a feed rate of 0.4 ml/h. A stand-off distance of 150 mm was maintained between the needle tip and the collector during all fabrication processes. The rotating drum speeds used for the fabrication process were 1500 and 1200 rpm for pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, respectively, which are equivalent to tangential speeds of 31.4 and 25.1 m/s, respectively. The electrospinning process was conducted at a relative humidity percentage of approximately 23 \(\pm \) 3%, which was automatically maintained using the dehumidification unit. The fabricated membranes were finally laser-cut into standard dimensions for characterization using a CO2 laser machine (VLS 2.30; Versa Laser Systems, Scottsdale, AZ, USA) with a power of 2.0 watts, an optical focal length of 50.8 mm, and a pulse density of 393.7 pulse/in.
First, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JEOL JSM-6510 IV, Japan) was used to characterize the morphology of the electrospun membranes. Image-J software was employed to measure approximately 200 random fiber diameters, extracted from three distinct SEM images, for each membrane. The average fiber diameter of the mats was then analyzed and calculated based on the collected data. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) observations were carried out by using HR-TEM (JEOL,JEM-2100,Japan). The composition and structure of the membranes were then analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrometry (X’Pert3 Powder, Malvern PANalytical, UK) in the range of 4° to 70° with a time step of 0.6 s, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry (Nicolet iS10, ThermoFisher Scientific, UK) with a wave number range of 650–4000 cm-1.
The mechanical properties of the nanofibrous membranes were investigated through tensile and elastic recovery tests. Tensile testing was performed on a universal testing machine (Zwick Z010, Germany) with a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min and 100 N load cell. Three rectangular specimens (10 × 60 mm) were laser-cut and affixed onto a cardboard frame to facilitate secure fixation onto the machine grippers39. After clamping the specimen, the cardboard frame was cut to initiate the test, as shown in Fig. 2. Young’s modulus (E), maximum value of stress (σmax ) and strain at maximum stress (εmax) were determined as the average value of the tested samples.
Preparation of tensile test samples; (a) test sample attached to the sample holder, (b) sample clamped onto the machine and cutting the sample holder sides.
The tensile stress was calculated using two different methods: first, the standard mat cross-section normalization method (SN), which was proven to be unreliable for such nanofibrous mats and dependent on the method with which the membrane thickness was measured, which in this study’s case was a pneumatic digital micrometer. The second method is Mass-based normalization (MN), where the tensile stress was calculated using Eq. (1) 40,
where m is the mass of the sample (measured in mg), ρm is the material density, F is the force (measured in N), L is the initial length of the sample (measured in mm) and σ is the stress expressed in MPa. The density corrections of the samples were performed according to the weight percentage of the nanoparticles41. This type of stress calculation enables more realistic values compared to the standard approach, where the cross-section area of the sample is used. Young’s modulus was calculated from the slope value of the stress–strain curve when the strain was 10%42,43.
Additionally, an elastic recovery test was conducted on the same setup under stress control with a crosshead speed of 100 mm/min. The hysteresis of elastic recovery was studied by applying 20 cycles of 50% of the maximum tensile stress obtained from the initial tensile test44. The thermal stability of the materials was evaluated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (Mettler Toledo TA-TGA), where the samples were heated in an N2 atmosphere to 600 °C at a heating rate of 15 °C/min.
Lastly, a dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) (Triton Instruments, Lincolnshire, UK) was conducted in tension mode to investigate the viscoelastic properties of the polymeric membranes. Rectangular samples (10 × 25 mm) were tested, and the temperature was controlled using liquid Nitrogen over a range of − 60 to 100 °C with an oscillation frequency of 1.0 Hz and a scanning rate of 5 °C/min. DMA is a powerful technique that can provide valuable insights into the viscoelastic behavior of materials, including their storage modulus, loss modulus, damping ratio, and response to mechanical stress as a function of multiple parameters, including temperature and frequency45,46,47. The combination of these techniques provided a comprehensive characterization of the electrospun membranes, enabling a better understanding of their thermo-mechanical properties and potential applications.
Figures 3a and b show the SEM images of the randomly oriented pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, respectively. The images revealed clear, smooth 3-D fibrous structures in random orientations, with varying fiber diameters and an obvious absence of beads. Furthermore, Fig. 3c and d demonstrate the fiber diameter distribution for both the pure TPU and the TPU/CNT randomly oriented mats, respectively.
SEM images of randomly oriented (a) pure TPU and (b) TPU/CNT membranes, and fiber diameter distribution of randomly oriented (c) pure TPU and (d) TPU/CNT membranes.
The SEM images for the unidirectionally electrospun pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, however, are illustrated in Fig. 4a and b, respectively. While the fibers in the pure TPU sample show a slight deviation from the 0° spinning angle, most of the fibers have the same uniform orientation. On the other hand, the fibers in the TPU/CNT membranes have a more 0° spinning angle, but multiple fibers can be seen to have a completely different orientation. Figure 4c and d show the fiber diameter distribution for unidirectionally aligned pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, respectively. The average fiber diameter along with some statistical calculations of the fiber distribution for all four membranes are presented in Table 1.
SEM images of unidirectionally aligned (a) pure TPU and (b) TPU/CNT membranes, and fiber diameter distribution of unidirectionally aligned (c) pure TPU and (d) TPU/CNT membranes.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a valuable technique for investigating the disposition of CNT on electrospun nanofibers, primarily due to the higher density of CNT compared to the polymer matrix48. In TEM images, CNT with hollow structures appear as darker concentric tubular features embedded within the polymer nanofibers, in contrast to the uniform appearance of the fibers. Figure 5 displays TEM images of the TPU/CNT mats, with the CNT exhibiting a darker contrast compared to the TPU matrix, indicating their different densities. The images reveal a remarkable uniform distribution of CNT within the nanofibers, devoid of any noticeable aggregation. Notably, several CNT display an intriguing parallel alignment along the axis of the nanofiber, lending credence to the notion of an organized and well-dispersed arrangement. This observation offers compelling evidence of an aligned and evenly spread distribution of CNT within the electrospun nanofiber matrix. These findings align with similar studies conducted by other researchers49,50.
TEM images of electrospun TPU/CNT nanofibrous mat.
The structural transitions caused by interactions of the covalent bonds among the functional groups of the electrospun composite phases were studied using both XRD and FT-IR characterization techniques. Figure 6 shows the XRD patterns of TPU and TPU/CNT mats. The TPU nanofibrous membrane has a broad peak around 2Ө = 20°, while according to the literature, the MWCNTs have a diffraction peak at 2Ө = 26.03°51,52. The XRD pattern of TPU/CNT fibrous mat reveals one characteristic peak at 2Ө similar to that of TPU with downshifted intensity and more pronounced in randomly oriented mats, Fig. 5b, revealing that the inclusion of MWCNTs produced an orderly arrangement of TPU molecular chains53. The complete dispersion of CNT within the TPU matrix is indicated by the lack of a peak at 2θ = 26.03° in the TPU/CNT composite51,52,54.
XRD spectra of (a) unidirectional pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, and (b) randomly oriented pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes.
FT-IR spectra of TPU and TPU/CNT in both orientations are shown in Fig. 7. Typically, the spectrum of the TPU membrane shows peaks at 1070 cm−1 for (C–O), 1232 cm−1 for (C–C), 1569 cm−1 for (C=C), 1670 cm−1 for (C=O), 292 cm−1 for (C– H), and 3423 cm−1 for (N–H) 39, while for MWCNTs the spectrum shows peaks at 1097 cm-1 for (C–O), 1698 cm-1 is for (C=O), and 2924 cm-1 for (C–H) 55.
FT-IR spectra for (a) unidirectional pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, and (b) randomly oriented pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes.
From the figure, it can be noted that all the materials show similar peaks at different intensities, and the intensity increases with an increase in polymeric chain length. The peaks shown in Fig. 7. are located at 1073 cm−1 (C–O), 1595 cm−1 (C=C), 1795 cm−1 (C=O), 2952 cm−1 (C–H), and 3325 cm−1 (N–H). The presence of peaks for (C=C) bonds is due to the addition of CNT. However, the addition of CNT did not result in any significant alterations to the chemical structure of the nanofibers in general54,56,57.
To investigate the mechanical properties of the electrospun nanofibrous mats and ensure high levels of stretchability and durability, tensile and elastic recovery tests were conducted. The recorded stress-strain and cyclic stress-strain curves are presented in Figs. 8 and 9, respectively. Figure 8 illustrates the tensile stress-strain relationships of each material, employing two distinct curves. The solid lines correspond to the mass-based normalization (MN) results, while the dashed lines represent the mat section normalization (SN) results.
Stress–strain diagram for (a) unidirectional pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, and (b) randomly oriented pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes.
Cyclic stress–strain diagram for (a) unidirectional pure TPU membrane, (b) unidirectional TPU/CNT membrane, (c) randomly oriented pure TPU membrane, and (d) randomly oriented TPU/CNT membrane.
The results indicate that while the pure TPU nanofibrous mats have significantly higher stretchability than the TPU/CNT sample for both fiber alignments, as shown in Fig. 8, the addition of CNT increases Young’s modulus for the nanofibrous mats. Figure 8a showcases that the presence of CNT in the TPU unidirectional membranes has increased Young's modulus by 7.6%, while reducing the tensile strength by 2.2% and the maximum strain by 33.6%. This behavior may be attributed to the interaction between TPU and CNT at an intermolecular level, which adversely affects the stretchability of electrospun TPU58,59. Furthermore, the TPU and TPU/CNT fibrous membranes in randomly oriented fiber alignment displayed similar behavior, with the exception of maximum stress value, as shown in Fig. 8b. In this case, the tensile strength of pure TPU has increased by 56.4% due to the presence of CNT content, and Young's modulus has been increased by 92.3%, while the maximum strain has been reduced by 48.8%. Table 2 provides a summary of the data of stress-strain curves for TPU and TPU/CNT membranes. Table 3 compares the mechanical properties of TPU and TPU/CNT mas obtained in this study with the characteristics of other electrospun nanofibrous mats found in literature.
In Fig. 9, the elastic recovery behavior of TPU and TPU/CNT nanofibrous membranes with random and unidirectional fiber orientations is compared. The figures show the first seven cycles of a twenty-cycle elastic recovery behavior test, where significant hysteresis was observed with distinct loading and unloading paths for each cycle. Upon reloading, all four mats exhibited increased compliance, indicating stress softening behavior with higher strain during the second loading curve. The reloading curves shifted towards higher strains than the preceding loading cycle, indicating permanent set. The elastic recovery was quantified by comparing the difference between applied strain and permanent set for each loading–unloading cycle. The data from the cyclic stress–strain curves are presented in Table 4.
In the first cycle, the randomly oriented TPU membranes demonstrated the highest strain end point (SEP) values, indicating their ability to withstand greater deformation during cyclic loading. Conversely, the addition of CNT into TPU random fibers shows a reduction in both the stain end point and the elastic recovery (ER) by ~ 53%, suggesting a reduction in their recovery capabilities. These findings align with the results obtained from the tensile tests conducted. Likewise, the aligned membranes follow a similar trend, although with slightly lower values, with a ~ 47% reduction in SEP, and a ~ 42% reduction in ER for the TPU and TPU/CNT membranes.
Looking at the 20th cycles for each material and comparing them with the first cycles, it was observed that both the randomly aligned membranes showed an increase in both elastic recovery and strain end point. Specifically, the TPU randomly aligned membranes exhibited a 23% increase in SEP and a 10% increase in ER, while the TPU/CNT random membranes showed a 20% increase in strain end point and a 10% increase in elastic recovery values.
Similarly, comparing the 1st and 20th cycles for the aligned membranes, the TPU uniformly aligned membranes exhibited a 23% increase in SEP and a 12% increase in ER values. Moreover, the increase for the TPU/CNT unidirectional membranes was 18% and 13% in SEP and ER values, respectively.
These results indicate that unidirectional membranes have a higher capability of sustaining slightly higher strains and improved recovery capacities over the course of the 20 cycles. They also suggested that the presence of CNT in these membranes may have had a slight influence on their mechanical behavior, resulting in a somewhat lesser improvement in their recovery capacities compared to the pure TPU membranes.
To gain a better understanding of the elastic recovery behavior, the ER/SEP ratio, which represents the percentage of elastic recovery compared to the strain end point, was determined. The greatest ER/SEP ratios were found in TPU/CNT membranes with unidirectional alignment, suggesting the most effective elastic recovery relative to their strain capacity.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed to evaluate the thermostability of the fabricated TPU and TPU/CNT nanofibrous mats during thermal degradation. The TGA curves for pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes are presented in Fig. 10. The thermal degradation for all the materials occurs in a single stage due to its compatibility with thermodynamic stability65,66. For the pure TPU nanofibrous mat, two clear degradation temperatures were observed, corresponding to the decomposition of the hard and soft segments. The hard segments had a first decomposition temperature of ~ 276 °C, whereas the soft segments had a second decomposition temperature of ~ 436 °C, because the amide bonds in the hard segments were simpler to break than the other bonds in the soft segments67,68.
TGA curve for pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes.
The addition of CNT into TPU resulted in thermal degradation properties of the TPU/CNT nanofibrous mat that were significantly closer to those of pure TPU. Thus, the polymer structure of the TPU did not change after mixing, suggesting that the TPU/CNT nanocomposite has steady thermal degradation properties67. This finding is consistent with previous studies that have reported the compatibility and stability of TPU and CNT in a nanocomposite structure69. The results from the TGA analysis indicate that the TPU/CNT nanofibrous mats have promise for use in applications that require stable thermal properties70.
DMA was selected for this research due to its high sensitivity to glass transition, which is estimated to be 100 times higher than differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) 71. The technique is also capable of detecting more localized transitions, such as side chain movements, that are not detectable by DSC. Additionally, DMA allows for the rapid scanning of a material's modulus and viscosity as a function of temperature, strain, or frequency72.
The DMA consists of two main components: the storage modulus (E′) and the loss modulus (E″). E′ is a measure of the energy stored in the material when it is deformed and is related to the material's ability to store energy and recover its original shape after deformation. E″ is a measure of the energy dissipated by the material as it undergoes deformation and is related to the material's ability to absorb energy and convert it into heat. The damping ratio (tan δ) is the ratio of the loss modulus to the storage modulus and is a measure of the material's ability to dissipate energy and its damping properties73.
The glass transition is a temperature range rather than a single point, and it is necessary to designate distinct locations within this transition zone in order to characterize it. There are three methods for determining the glass transition temperature in the context of DMA analysis (Tg) 74. The first involves identifying Tg as the extrapolated onset of the sigmoidal decrease in the storage modulus, observed when transitioning from the hard, brittle region to the soft, rubbery region of the tested materials under specific parameters. Alternatively, Tg can also be determined by observing the peaks in the loss modulus and tan delta curves73,75. The Tg values obtained from these methods are presented in Table 5.
All four specimens’ glass transition ranged from − 60 °C to − 20 °C, which is the transition region for the mats. Due to the crosslinking network in the TPU chains, the composites acted solid and rigid below the transition region before becoing soft and rubbery when the temperature passed through the transition region76.
In Fig. 11, E′ of both TPU and TPU/CNT decreases progressively with increasing temperature, then drops abruptly at the glass transition (Tg)77. This decrease in storage modulus refers to the thermal transition from a glassy to a rubbery phase (transition region)78. The storage modulus (E′) was measured over a temperature range from − 80 °C to 80 °C. The addition of CNT to both randomly oriented and unidirectionally aligned TPU mats resulted in significantly higher storage modulus compared to the pure TPU mats. This increase can be attributed to the enhanced interfacial adhesion between the CNT and the TPU matrix, facilitating improved load transfer and increased stiffness79. These findings align with similar studies conducted by other researchers80,81,82, further supporting the positive impact of CNT incorporation on the thermomechanical properties of TPU nanofibrous mats.
Temperature dependence of storage modulus as measured by DMA for (a) unidirectional pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, and (b) randomly oriented pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes.
Furthermore, it is evident in Fig. 11 that the storage modulus of randomly oriented membranes is significantly higher than that of their unidirectionally aligned counterparts. This observed behavior can be attributed to the increased fiber–fiber interactions and entanglements within the randomly oriented membranes. These interactions enhance the load-bearing capabilities of the membrane, resulting in a higher storage modulus79. On the other hand, the fibers in the unidirectionally aligned nanofibrous membranes are oriented in a specific direction, allowing for easier deformation and reduced fiber–fiber interactions79.
Similarly, the loss modulus follows the same behavior, with the TPU/CNT mats having a higher peak than that of the pure TPU mats, and the random membranes having a much higher peak than the unidirectionally oriented ones as shown in Fig. 12. This behavior can be explained by the fact that the random orientation of the fibers creates more disordered and less efficient load transfer mechanisms, leading to more energy dissipation.
Temperature dependence of loss modulus as measured by DMA for (a) unidirectional pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, and (b) randomly oriented pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes.
The damping ratio (tan δ) for the randomly oriented materials is higher than that of the aligned fibers membranes, as is displayed in Fig. 13, as the random orientation of the fibers leads to more energy dissipation and lower energy storage76,78. Overall, the DMA results suggest that the fiber orientation has a significant effect on the viscoelastic properties of the material, and the addition of CNT can significantly modify the viscoelastic characteristics of TPU, making it suitable for different applications that require specific viscoelastic properties. The data of temperature dependence of storage modulus, loss modulus and tan delta for all mats is summarized in Table 6.
Temperature dependence of tan delta as measured by DMA for (a) unidirectional pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, and (b) randomly oriented pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes.
Figure 14 depicts the Cole–Cole plot, which showcases the correlation between storage modulus and loss modulus values. The plot is a valuable tool to interpret the state of homogeneity of blends and fillers dispersion within polymeric composite systems83. It has been established that the homogeneous polymeric materials exhibit nearly perfect semi-circular shapes, while other multiphase systems tend to display deviations towards elliptical curves84,85,86.Conversely, irregular, or imperfect arcs indicate blend heterogeneity or filler agglomeration87. In Fig. 14, both the pure TPU and TPU/CNT mats in both orientations exhibit similar elliptical shapes. This observation suggests a homogeneous distribution of CNT and enhanced adhesion between the components of the multiphase system88,89.
Cole–Cole plot for, (a) unidirectional pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes, and (b) randomly oriented pure TPU and TPU/CNT membranes.
In conclusion, in this comparative study, the impact of fiber alignment and muti-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) content on the properties of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) nanofibers was explored. The study revealed that the random and aligned nanofibers had distinct and highly uniform morphologies. The XRD and FTIR analyses provided valuable insights into the crystalline and chemical structures of the produced nanofibers and nanofibrous composites. The thermal stability of the nanofibers slightly improved with the addition of MWCNTs. The Tg of all materials lied between the temperature range of − 60 °C to − 20 °C.
The mechanical characteristics of the mats were highly affected by the orientation of the fibers, where the nanofibers with aligned orientation exhibited superior mechanical properties compared to those with random orientation. However, the presence of MWCNTs lead to an increase in tensile strength by 33.6%, increased the Young's modulus by 7.6%, and lowered the maximum strain by 33.6% in the aligned orientation. While, for the random fibrous mats, the tensile strength increased by only 56.4% the maximum strain was reduced by 48.8%, and the Young's modulus increased by 92.3%.
The study also showed that fiber alignment significantly affects the viscoelastic properties of the nanofibers. The DMA results showed that the TPU/CNT nanofibers exhibited higher storage modulus and loss modulus compared to the TPU nanofibers. Furthermore, it showed that the membranes with random orientation have higher storage and loss modulus than the aligned membranes, indicating more energy dissipation. The study provides valuable insights that can be used to design and optimize nanofibrous materials for various advanced applications, including tissue engineering, sensors, and wearable electronics (Supplementary Material).
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Ko, F., Sukigara, S., Gandhi, M. and Ayutsede, J. Electrospun carbon nanotube reinforced silk fibers. 2007, Google Patents.
Elahi, H., Eugeni, M. & Gaudenzi, P. A review on mechanisms for piezoelectric-based energy harvesters. Energies 11(7), 1850 (2018).
Zhang, J., Liu, L., Si, Y., Yu, J. & Ding, B. Electrospun nanofibrous membranes: an effective arsenal for the purification of emulsified oily wastewater. Adv. Func. Mater. 30(25), 2002192 (2020).
Huang, A. et al. Electrospun poly (butylene succinate)/cellulose nanocrystals bio-nanocomposite scaffolds for tissue engineering: Preparation, characterization and in vitro evaluation. Polym. Test. 71, 101–109 (2018).
Li, J., Zhang, X., Lu, Y., Linghu, K., Wang, C., Ma, Z. and He, X. Electrospun fluorinated polyimide/polyvinylidene fluoride composite membranes with high thermal stability for lithium ion battery separator. Adv. Fiber Mater. 1–11 (2022).
Huffman, M. L. & Venton, B. J. Electrochemical properties of different carbon-fiber microelectrodes using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. Electroanal. An Int. J. Devoted Fundam. Pract. Aspects Electroanal. 20(22), 2422–2428 (2008).
Bhardwaj, N. & Kundu, S. C. Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol. Adv. 28(3), 325–347 (2010).
He, X.-X. et al. Near-field electrospinning: Progress and applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 121(16), 8663–8678 (2017).
Blachowicz, T. & Ehrmann, A. Most recent developments in electrospun magnetic nanofibers: A review. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 15, 1558925019900843 (2020).
Mohammadpourfazeli, S. et al. Future prospects and recent developments of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) piezoelectric polymer; fabrication methods, structure, and electro-mechanical properties. RSC Adv. 13(1), 370–387 (2023).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wu, J.-H. et al. Electrospinning of PLA nanofibers: Recent advances and its potential application for food packaging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 70(27), 8207–8221 (2022).
Mochane, M. J., Motsoeneng, T. S., Sadiku, E. R., Mokhena, T. C. & Sefadi, J. S. Morphology and properties of electrospun PCL and its composites for medical applications: A mini review. Appl. Sci. 9(11), 2205 (2019).
Duman, O., Uğurlu, H., Diker, C. Ö. & Tunç, S. Fabrication of highly hydrophobic or superhydrophobic electrospun PVA and agar/PVA membrane materials for efficient and selective oil/water separation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10(3), 107405 (2022).
Banitaba, S. N. et al. Electrospun PEO nanofibrous membrane enable by LiCl, LiClO 4, and LiTFSI salts: A versatile solvent-free electrolyte for lithium-ion battery application. Ionics 26, 3249–3260 (2020).
Guan, J., Fujimoto, K. L., Sacks, M. S. & Wagner, W. R. Preparation and characterization of highly porous, biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for soft tissue applications. Biomaterials 26(18), 3961–3971 (2005).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dasdemir, M., Topalbekiroglu, M. & Demir, A. Electrospinning of thermoplastic polyurethane microfibers and nanofibers from polymer solution and melt. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 127(3), 1901–1908 (2013).
Ahmadian, A., Shafiee, A., Aliahmad, N. & Agarwal, M. Overview of nano-fiber mats fabrication via electrospinning and morphology analysis. Textiles 1(2), 206–226 (2021).
Kijeńska-Gawrońska, E., Maliszewski, A. & Bil, M. Evaluation of the shape memory effect of random and aligned electrospun polyurethane mats with different fibers diameter. Polymers 14(24), 5468 (2022).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Le Pham, Q., Uspenskaya, M. V., Olekhnovich, R. O. & Baranov, M. A. The mechanical properties of PVC nanofiber mats obtained by electrospinning. Fibers 9(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib9010002 (2021).
Maciel, M. et al. Relation between fiber orientation and mechanical properties of nano-engineered poly (vinylidene fluoride) electrospun composite fiber mats. Compos. Part B: Eng. 139, 146–154 (2018).
Xue, B., Zhang, F., Zheng, J. & Xu, C. Flexible piezoelectric device directly assembled through the continuous electrospinning method. Smart Mater. Struct. 30(4), 045006 (2021).
Geng, J. & Zeng, T. Influence of single-walled carbon nanotubes induced crystallinity enhancement and morphology change on polymer photovoltaic devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128(51), 16827–16833 (2006).
Xie, N., Niu, J., Gao, X., Fang, Y. & Zhang, Z. Fabrication and characterization of electrospun fatty acid form-stable phase change materials in the presence of copper nanoparticles. Int. J. Energy Res. 44(11), 8567–8577 (2020).
He, F. L. et al. Controlled release of antibiotics from poly-ε-caprolactone/polyethylene glycol wound dressing fabricated by direct-writing melt electrospinning. Polym. Adv. Technol. 30(2), 425–434 (2019).
Agarwal, S., Greiner, A. & Wendorff, J. H. Functional materials by electrospinning of polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 38(6), 963–991 (2013).
Chen, K. et al. Electrochemical sensors fabricated by electrospinning technology: An overview. Sensors 19(17), 3676 (2019).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jayathilaka, W. A. D. M. et al. Significance of nanomaterials in wearables: A review on wearable actuators and sensors. Adv. Mater. 31(7), 1805921 (2019).
Li, H. et al. Application of electrospinning in antibacterial field. Nanomaterials 11(7), 1822 (2021).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Kirk, J., Kinloch, I., Shaffer, M. & Windle, A. Ultra-low electrical percolation threshold in carbon-nanotube-epoxy composites. Polymer 44(19), 5893–5899 (2003).
Xue, J., Wu, T., Dai, Y. & Xia, Y. Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers: Methods, materials, and applications. Chem. Rev. 119(8), 5298–5415. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ahir, S., Huang, Y. & Terentjev, E. Polymers with aligned carbon nanotubes: Active composite materials. Polymer 49(18), 3841–3854 (2008).
Eivazi Zadeh, Z., Solouk, A., Shafieian, M. & Haghbin Nazarpak, M. Electrospun polyurethane/carbon nanotube composites with different amounts of carbon nanotubes and almost the same fiber diameter for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 118, 111403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111403 (2021).
Özkan, V., Yapici, A. & Özkan, A. Production of multi-walled carbon nanotube and graphene doped thermoplastic polyurethane fiber and investigation of mechanical properties. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 9(10), 101011 (2020).
Wang, X. et al. Strain and stress sensing properties of the MWCNT/TPU nanofiber film. Surf. Interfaces 32, 102132 (2022).
Tang, J., Wu, Y., Ma, S., Yan, T. & Pan, Z. Flexible strain sensor based on CNT/TPU composite nanofiber yarn for smart sports bandage. Compos. Part B: Eng. 232, 109605 (2022).
Huang, J. et al. Highly sensitive and stretchable CNT-Bridged AgNP strain sensor based on TPU electrospun membrane for human motion detection. Adv. Electron. Mater. 5(6), 1900241 (2019).
Han, L., Xu, J., Wang, S., Yuan, N. & Ding, J. Multiresponsive actuators based on modified electrospun films. RSC advances 8(19), 10302–10309 (2018).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Haider, A., Haider, S. & Kang, I.-K. A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology. Arab. J. Chem. 11(8), 1165–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.11.015 (2018).
Shaker, A., Hassanin, A. H., Shaalan, N. M., Hassan, M. A. & El-Moneim, A. A. Micropatterned flexible strain gauge sensor based on wet electrospun polyurethane/PEDOT: PSS nanofibers. Smart Mater. Struct. 28, 075029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab20a2 (2019).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Maccaferri, E. et al. How nanofibers carry the load: Toward a universal and reliable approach for tensile testing of polymeric nanofibrous membranes. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 306(7), 2100183 (2021).
Kubin, M. et al. Effects of nano-sized BaTiO3 on microstructural, thermal, mechanical and piezoelectric behavior of electrospun PVDF/BaTiO3 nanocomposite mats. Polym. Test. 126, 108158 (2023).
Luo, Z., Zhang, L., Liang, Y., Wen, S. & Liu, L. Improved the dielectric properties of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer filled with MXene nanosheets and BaTiO3 nanofibers. Polym. Test. 111, 107592 (2022).
Han, S. et al. Mechanically robust, highly sensitive and superior cycling performance nanocomposite strain sensors using 3-nm thick graphene platelets. Polym. Test. 98, 107178 (2021).
Shi, Y., Chen, H. & Guan, X. High shape memory properties and high strength of shape memory polyurethane nanofiber-based yarn and coil. Polym. Test. 101, 107277 (2021).
Joshi, S. et al. Improved electrical signal of non-poled 3D printed zinc oxide-polyvinylidene fluoride nanocomposites. Polymers 14(20), 4312 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. An anisotropic dielectric elastomer actuator with an oriented electrospun nanofiber composite film. Adv. Mater. Technol. 8(8), 2201706 (2023).
Barua, B. & Saha, M. C. Studies of reaction mechanisms during stabilization of electrospun polyacrylonitrile carbon nanofibers. Polym. Eng. Sci. 58(8), 1315–1321 (2018).
Hou, H. et al. Electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofibers containing a high concentration of well-aligned multiwall carbon nanotubes. Chem. Mater. 17(5), 967–973 (2005).
Cao, L., Su, D., Su, Z. & Chen, X. Fabrication of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polypropylene conductive fibrous membranes by melt electrospinning. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53(6), 2308–2317 (2014).
Simotwo, S. K., DelRe, C. & Kalra, V. Supercapacitor electrodes based on high-purity electrospun polyaniline and polyaniline–carbon nanotube nanofibers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(33), 21261–21269 (2016).
Gedam, S. S. et al. Thermal, mechanical and morphological study of carbon nanotubes-graphene oxide and silver nanoparticles based polyurethane composites. Mater. Res. Express 6(8), 085308. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab1db4 (2019).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Shi, H. et al. Effect of polyethylene glycol on the antibacterial properties of polyurethane/carbon nanotube electrospun nanofibers. RSC Adv. 6(23), 19238–19244 (2016).
Hu, D. et al. Highly stretchable strain sensors using an electrospun polyurethane nanofiber/graphene composite. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 16(6), 5839–5842 (2016).
Beniwal, A. & Sunny,. Novel TPU/Fe2O3 and TPU/Fe2O3/PPy nanocomposites synthesized using electrospun nanofibers investigated for analyte sensing applications at room temperature. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 304, 127384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.127384 (2020).
Girei, S. et al. Effect of –COOH functionalized carbon nanotubes on mechanical, dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene nanocomposites. J. Thermoplast. Compos Mater 25, 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705711406159 (2012).
Ahmadi, Z., Ravandi, S. A. H., Haghighat, F. & Dabirian, F. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of PAN nanofiber/carbon nanotube composite mats produced via needleless electrospinning system. Fibers Polym. 21, 1200–1211 (2020).
Li, Y. et al. Continuously prepared highly conductive and stretchable SWNT/MWNT synergistically composited electrospun thermoplastic polyurethane yarns for wearable sensing. J. Mater. Chem. C 6(9), 2258–2269 (2018).
Shamsi, R., Koosha, M. & Mahyari, M. Improving the mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of polyurethane-graphene oxide nanocomposites synthesized by in-situ polymerization of ester-based polyol with hexamethylene diisocyanate. J. Polym. Res. 23, 1–11 (2016).
Maccaferri, E. et al. Is graphene always effective in reinforcing composites? The case of highly graphene-modified thermoplastic nanofibers and their unfortunate application in CFRP laminates. Polymers 14(24), 5565 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wijayanti, I. D. et al. An ultra-low-cost and adjustable in-house electrospinning machine to produce PVA nanofiber. HardwareX 11, e00315 (2022).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bazbouz, M. B. & Stylios, G. K. The tensile properties of electrospun nylon 6 single nanofibers. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 48(15), 1719–1731 (2010).
Huang, A. et al. Novel PTFE/CNT composite nanofiber membranes with enhanced mechanical, crystalline, conductive, and dielectric properties fabricated by emulsion electrospinning and sintering. Compos. Sci. Technol. 214, 108980 (2021).
Zaarour, B., Zhu, L. & Jin, X. Controlling the surface structure, mechanical properties, crystallinity, and piezoelectric properties of electrospun PVDF nanofibers by maneuvering molecular weight. Soft Mater. 17(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1539445X.2019.1582542 (2019).
Sathirapongsasuti, N., Panaksri, A., Boonyagul, S., Chutipongtanate, S. & Tanadchangsaeng, N. Electrospun fibers of polybutylene succinate/graphene oxide composite for syringe-push protein absorption membrane. Polymers 13(13), 2042 (2021).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, C.-F., Chen, C.-W., Chuang, F.-S. & Rwei, S.-P. Thermoplastic polyurethane/CNT nanocomposites with low electromagnetic resistance property. J. Compos. Mater. 55(29), 4321–4331 (2021).
Pourmohammadi-Mahunaki, M., Haddadi-Asl, V., Roghani-Mamaqani, H., Koosha, M. & Yazdi, M. Halloysite-reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites: Physico-mechanical, rheological, and thermal investigations.Polym.Compos.41(8), 3260–3270 (2020).
Buczek, O., Krowarsch, D. & Otlewski, J. Thermodynamics of single peptide bond cleavage in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI). Prot. Sci. 11(4), 924–932 (2002).
Fuensanta, M. & Martín-Martínez, J. M. Thermoplastic polyurethane coatings made with mixtures of polyethers of different molecular weights with pressure sensitive adhesion property. Prog. Organic Coat. 118, 148–156 (2018).
Roy, S., Srivastava, S. K., Pionteck, J. & Mittal, V. Montmorillonite–multiwalled carbon nanotube nanoarchitecture reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane. Polym. Compos. 37(6), 1775–1785 (2016).
Fang, C. et al. Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the physical properties and crystallisation of recycled PET/TPU composites. RSC Adv. 8(16), 8920–8928. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra13634j (2018).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rodrigues, P. C. & Akcelrud, L. Networks and blends of polyaniline and polyurethane: correlations between composition and thermal, dynamic mechanical and electrical properties. Polymer 44(22), 6891–6899 (2003).
Menard, K. P. and Menard, N. R. Dynamic mechanical analysis in the analysis of polymers and rubbers. Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology: p. 1–33, (2002).
Chee, S. S., Jawaid, M. & Hameed Sultan, M. T. Thermal stability and dynamic mechanical properties of kenaf/bamboo fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Bioresources https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.4.7118-7132 (2017).
Instruments, T., Measurement of glass transition temperatures by dynamic mechanical analysis and rheology. (2021).
Kannan, M., Joseph, K. & Thomas, S. Dynamic mechanical properties of nanoclay filled TPU/PP blends with compatibiliser. Plast. Rubber Compos. 44(6), 245–251 (2015).
Rueda-Larraz, L. et al. Synthesis and microstructure–mechanical property relationships of segmented polyurethanes based on a PCL–PTHF–PCL block copolymer as soft segment. Eur. Polym. J. 45(7), 2096–2109 (2009).
Saralegi, A. et al. Thermoplastic polyurethanes from renewable resources: Effect of soft segment chemical structure and molecular weight on morphology and final properties. Polym. Int. 62(1), 106–115 (2013).
Klinedinst, D. B., Yilgör, I., Yilgör, E., Zhang, M. & Wilkes, G. L. The effect of varying soft and hard segment length on the structure–property relationships of segmented polyurethanes based on a linear symmetric diisocyanate, 1, 4-butanediol and PTMO soft segments. Polymer 53(23), 5358–5366 (2012).
Guo, R., Azaiez, J. & Bellehumeur, C. Rheology of fiber filled polymer melts: Role of fiber-fiber interactions and polymer-fiber coupling. Polym. Eng. Sci. 45(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.20285 (2005).
Mei, L.Y., P. Song, and Y.Q. Liu (2015) Magnetic‐field‐assisted electrospinning highly aligned composite nanofibers containing well‐aligned multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 132(22)
Yang, S., Taha-Tijerina, J., Serrato-Diaz, V., Hernandez, K. & Lozano, K. Dynamic mechanical and thermal analysis of aligned vapor grown carbon nanofiber reinforced polyethylene. Compos. Part B: Eng. 38(2), 228–235 (2007).
Esmizadeh, E. et al. Tailoring the properties of PA6 into high-performance thermoplastic elastomer: Simultaneous reinforcement and impact property modification. Mater. Today Commun. 26, 102027 (2021).
Mousavi, M. R., Tehran, A. C. & Shelesh-Nezhad, K. Study on morphology, mechanical, thermal and viscoelastic properties of PA6/TPU/CNT nanocomposites. Plast. Rubber Compos. 49(9), 400–413 (2020).
Jyoti, J., Singh, B. P., Arya, A. K. & Dhakate, S. Dynamic mechanical properties of multiwall carbon nanotube reinforced ABS composites and their correlation with entanglement density, adhesion, reinforcement and C factor. RSC Adv. 6(5), 3997–4006 (2016).
Chandra, R., Singh, S. & Gupta, K. Damping studies in fiber-reinforced composites–a review. Compos. Struct. 46(1), 41–51 (1999).
Landel, R. F. and Nielsen, L. E., Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites. CRC press, (1993).
Saba, N. et al. Thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibers reinforced epoxy composites. Int. J.Biol. Macromol. 102, 822–828 (2017).
Panwar, V. & Pal, K. An optimal reduction technique for rGO/ABS composites having high-end dynamic properties based on Cole-Cole plot, degree of entanglement and C-factor. Compos. Part B: Eng. 114, 46–57 (2017).
Rasana, N., Jayanarayanan, K., Mohan, H. T. & Keller, T. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of nanosilica and multiwalled carbon nanotube reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene composites: Theoretical mechanism of nanofiller reinforcement. Iranian Polym. J. 30, 1211–1225 (2021).
This work was technically and financially supported by Nanomaterials Lab, Mechanical Design and Production Engineering Department, Zagazig University, Egypt. The authors gratefully acknowledge the technicians of Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI) and National Institute of Standards (NIS) for their technical support to this work.
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Mechanical Design and Production Engineering Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt
A. Shaker, Amira T. Khedewy, Mohamed A. Hassan & Marwa A. Abd El-Baky
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
A.S. had set the conceptualization of the article and wrote, edited and reviewed the original draft as well as participating in investigation and analyses; A.T. participated in experimental work, data analyses, visualization, validation and writing; M.A.H. participated in conceptualization and supervision; M.A. AbdE.-B. was involved in conceptualization, revision and supervision.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Shaker, A., Khedewy, A.T., Hassan, M.A. et al. Thermo-mechanical characterization of electrospun polyurethane/carbon-nanotubes nanofibers: a comparative study. Sci Rep 13, 17368 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44020-x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44020-x
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Scientific Reports (Sci Rep) ISSN 2045-2322 (online)
High Strength Pa66 Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.